[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2945fd68-6323-30f1-db6b-9ed1dba582a6@tessares.net>
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 11:27:45 +0200
From: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@...sares.net>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@...ux.intel.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, mptcp@...ts.01.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mptcp: MPTCP_KUNIT_TESTS should depend on MPTCP instead
of selecting it
Hi Geert,
On 20/10/2020 09:40, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 10:38 PM Geert Uytterhoeven
> <geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 5:47 PM Matthieu Baerts
>> <matthieu.baerts@...sares.net> wrote:
>>> On 19/10/2020 13:32, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>>>> MPTCP_KUNIT_TESTS selects MPTCP, thus enabling an optional feature the
>>>> user may not want to enable. Fix this by making the test depend on
>>>> MPTCP instead.
>>>
>>> I think the initial intension was to select MPTCP to have an easy way to
>>> enable all KUnit tests. We imitated what was and is still done in
>>> fs/ext4/Kconfig.
>>>
>>> But it probably makes sense to depend on MPTCP instead of selecting it.
>>> So that's fine for me. But then please also send a patch to ext4
>>> maintainer to do the same there.
>>
>> Thanks, good point. I didn't notice, as I did have ext4 enabled anyway.
>> Will send a patch for ext4. Looks like ext4 and MPTCP where the only
>> test modules selecting their dependencies.
>
> FTR, "[PATCH] ext: EXT4_KUNIT_TESTS should depend on EXT4_FS instead
> of selecting it"
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20201020073740.29081-1-geert@linux-m68k.org/
Thank you for having sent this other patch and shared the link here!
Groetjes,
Matt
--
Tessares | Belgium | Hybrid Access Solutions
www.tessares.net
Powered by blists - more mailing lists