[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201020123430.44968cb4@eldfell>
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 12:34:30 +0300
From: Pekka Paalanen <ppaalanen@...il.com>
To: Mugilraj Dhavachelvan <dmugil2000@...il.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Karol Herbst <karolherbst@...il.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, x86@...nel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/mm/kmmio: correctly handle kzalloc return
On Tue, 20 Oct 2020 14:13:44 +0530
Mugilraj Dhavachelvan <dmugil2000@...il.com> wrote:
> Replacing return value -1 to error code
>
> Signed-off-by: Mugilraj Dhavachelvan <dmugil2000@...il.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/mm/kmmio.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/kmmio.c b/arch/x86/mm/kmmio.c
> index be020a7bc414..15430520c232 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/kmmio.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/kmmio.c
> @@ -386,7 +386,7 @@ static int add_kmmio_fault_page(unsigned long addr)
>
> f = kzalloc(sizeof(*f), GFP_ATOMIC);
> if (!f)
> - return -1;
> + return -ENOMEN;
>
> f->count = 1;
> f->addr = addr;
Hi,
did you even build-test this?
Why did you write this patch? What does it achieve?
Thanks,
pq
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists