[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFH1YnNZ2WPbNOCnFGPaL=L7TrSUXhzVT_kGpskXj=CTnZPHvQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 18:12:08 +0800
From: Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@...il.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, pbonzini@...hat.com,
sean.j.christopherson@...el.com, vkuznets@...hat.com,
wanpengli@...cent.com, jmattson@...gle.com,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
mst@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] KVM: not link irqfd with a fake IRQ bypass producer
On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 2:32 PM Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 2020/10/19 下午5:06, Zhenzhong Duan wrote:
> > In case failure to setup Post interrupt for an IRQ, it make no sense
> > to assign irqfd->producer to the producer.
> >
> > This change makes code more robust.
>
>
> It's better to describe what issue we will get without this patch.
I didn't see an issue without this patch.
Regards
Zhenzhong
Powered by blists - more mailing lists