[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201020121913.GB9448@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 13:19:13 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Olivier Moysan <olivier.moysan@...com>
Cc: lgirdwood@...il.com, perex@...ex.cz, tiwai@...e.com,
alexandre.torgue@...com, arnaud.patard@...-net.org,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, arnaud.pouliquen@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: cs42l51: manage mclk shutdown delay
On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 11:04:57AM +0200, Olivier Moysan wrote:
> +static int mclk_event(struct snd_soc_dapm_widget *w,
> + struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol, int event)
> +{
> + struct snd_soc_component *comp = snd_soc_dapm_to_component(w->dapm);
> + struct cs42l51_private *cs42l51 = snd_soc_component_get_drvdata(comp);
> +
> + if (SND_SOC_DAPM_EVENT_ON(event))
> + return clk_prepare_enable(cs42l51->mclk_handle);
> +
> + /* Delay mclk shutdown to fulfill power-down sequence requirements */
> + msleep(20);
> + clk_disable_unprepare(cs42l51->mclk_handle);
Why not use a switch statement here? The control flow is a bit odd with
what's basically an if/else done with only one branch in the if - this
isn't idiomatic for DAPM stuff apart from anything else.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists