[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201020122514.GB19856@duo.ucw.cz>
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 14:25:14 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>
To: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Cc: Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com>,
Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>, kernel@...gutronix.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>,
linux-leds@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 1/3] tty: rename tty_kopen() and add new function
tty_kopen_shared()
Hi1
> Introduce a new function tty_kopen_shared() that yields a struct
> tty_struct. The semantic difference to tty_kopen() is that the tty is
> expected to be used already. So rename tty_kopen() to
> tty_kopen_exclusive() for clearness, adapt the single user and put the
> common code in a new static helper function.
>
> tty_kopen_shared is to be used to implement an LED trigger for tty
> devices in one of the next patches.
>
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
> ---
> drivers/accessibility/speakup/spk_ttyio.c | 2 +-
> drivers/tty/tty_io.c | 56 +++++++++++++++--------
> include/linux/tty.h | 5 +-
> 3 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> -struct tty_struct *tty_kopen(dev_t device)
> +static struct tty_struct *tty_kopen(dev_t device, int shared)
> {
bool? Otherwise I see nothing obviously wrong here.
But this is for Greg..
Best regards,
Pavel
--
http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (196 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists