[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c9eeaa283f4eafdd0dece7f4f8961aa5@codeaurora.org>
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 20:33:17 +0800
From: Can Guo <cang@...eaurora.org>
To: Avri Altman <Avri.Altman@....com>
Cc: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...roid.com,
Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...gle.com>,
Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] scsi: add more contexts in the ufs tracepoints
On 2020-10-20 19:57, Can Guo wrote:
> On 2020-10-20 19:02, Can Guo wrote:
>> On 2020-10-20 18:51, Avri Altman wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 2020-10-06 06:36, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>>>> > From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...gle.com>
>>>> >
>>>> > This adds user-friendly tracepoints with group id.
>>> You have the entire cdb as part of the upiu trace,
>>> Can't you parse what you need from there?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Avri
>>
>> Yes, but assume we have a large trace log file, having a
>> groud id allows us to filter the data by it easily, right?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Can Guo.
>
> I just dobule checked WRITE(10)'s CDB, byte 6 has group
> ID ONLY. So Avri is right, we don't even need to parse it,
> we can easily filter a ftrace log file by byte 6 to get the
> WRITE(10) cmds with specific group ID - we don't need this
> change.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Can Guo.
Please ignore my previous mail, I misunderstood the change. :(
You have my reivewed-by tag for this change.
Regards,
Can Guo.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists