[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <91637b13-c0ee-82bd-05cd-5ce848004eae@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 08:48:54 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
Jethro Beekman <jethro@...tanix.com>,
Darren Kenny <darren.kenny@...cle.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com, asapek@...gle.com, bp@...en8.de,
cedric.xing@...el.com, chenalexchen@...gle.com,
conradparker@...gle.com, cyhanish@...gle.com,
haitao.huang@...el.com, kai.huang@...el.com, kai.svahn@...el.com,
kmoy@...gle.com, ludloff@...gle.com, nhorman@...hat.com,
npmccallum@...hat.com, puiterwijk@...hat.com, rientjes@...gle.com,
sean.j.christopherson@...el.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
yaozhangx@...gle.com, mikko.ylinen@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v39 15/24] x86/sgx: Add SGX_IOC_ENCLAVE_PROVISION
> int __init sgx_drv_init(void)
> {
> unsigned int eax, ebx, ecx, edx;
> @@ -181,5 +192,12 @@ int __init sgx_drv_init(void)
> return ret;
> }
>
> + ret = misc_register(&sgx_dev_provision);
> + if (ret) {
> + pr_err("Creating /dev/sgx/provision failed with %d.\n", ret);
> + misc_deregister(&sgx_dev_enclave);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
Isn't it a *bit* too specific to say that a device file failed to be
created? Do other misc devices use this kind of message?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists