[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABCJKuf8=2A5fAY0rEZAWBw7q-PO8iFvmubGy4bj6GLZ7k8c9g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 09:42:05 -0700
From: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>,
Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-kbuild <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 13/25] kbuild: lto: merge module sections
On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 3:49 PM Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
> In looking at this again -- is this ifdef needed? Couldn't this be done
> unconditionally? (Which would make it an independent change...)
No, I suppose it's not needed. I can drop the ifdef from the next version.
Sami
Powered by blists - more mailing lists