[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <jhj7drkrcpr.mognet@arm.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 19:09:36 +0100
From: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>
To: Vanshidhar Konda <vanshikonda@...amperecomputing.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, patches@...erecomputing.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Anshuman.Khandual@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: NUMA: Kconfig: Increase max number of nodes
Hi,
Nit on the subject: this only increases the default, the max is still 2¹⁰.
On 20/10/20 18:34, Vanshidhar Konda wrote:
> The current arm64 max NUMA nodes default to 4. Today's arm64 systems can
> reach or exceed 16. Increase the number to 64 (matching x86_64).
>
> Signed-off-by: Vanshidhar Konda <vanshikonda@...amperecomputing.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/Kconfig | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> index 893130ce1626..3e69d3c981be 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> @@ -980,7 +980,7 @@ config NUMA
> config NODES_SHIFT
> int "Maximum NUMA Nodes (as a power of 2)"
> range 1 10
> - default "2"
> + default "6"
This leads to more statically allocated memory for things like node to CPU
maps (see uses of MAX_NUMNODES), but that shouldn't be too much of an
issue.
AIUI this also directly correlates to how many more page->flags bits are
required: are we sure the max 10 works on any aarch64 platform? I'm
genuinely asking here, given that I'm mostly a stranger to the mm
world. The default should be something we're somewhat confident works
everywhere.
> depends on NEED_MULTIPLE_NODES
> help
> Specify the maximum number of NUMA Nodes available on the target
Powered by blists - more mailing lists