| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <07557af4-32b5-7610-292c-9fd3bbfe9229@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 11:37:58 +0200
From: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
DRI Development <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@...ux.ibm.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...el.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 08/16] s390/pci: Remove races against pte updates
On 10/21/20 10:56 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Way back it was a reasonable assumptions that iomem mappings never
> change the pfn range they point at. But this has changed:
>
> - gpu drivers dynamically manage their memory nowadays, invalidating
> ptes with unmap_mapping_range when buffers get moved
>
> - contiguous dma allocations have moved from dedicated carvetouts to
> cma regions. This means if we miss the unmap the pfn might contain
> pagecache or anon memory (well anything allocated with GFP_MOVEABLE)
>
> - even /dev/mem now invalidates mappings when the kernel requests that
> iomem region when CONFIG_IO_STRICT_DEVMEM is set, see commit
> 3234ac664a87 ("/dev/mem: Revoke mappings when a driver claims the
> region")
>
> Accessing pfns obtained from ptes without holding all the locks is
> therefore no longer a good idea. Fix this.
>
> Since zpci_memcpy_from|toio seems to not do anything nefarious with
> locks we just need to open code get_pfn and follow_pfn and make sure
> we drop the locks only after we're done. The write function also needs
> the copy_from_user move, since we can't take userspace faults while
> holding the mmap sem.
>
> v2: Move VM_IO | VM_PFNMAP checks around so they keep returning EINVAL
> like before (Gerard)
>
> v3: Polish commit message (Niklas)
>
> Reviewed-by: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@...ux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...el.com>
> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
> Cc: Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>
> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
> Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> Cc: linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-media@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@...ux.ibm.com>
> Cc: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@...ux.ibm.com>
> Cc: linux-s390@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@...ux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.com>
^^^^
This should be ".ch", but since this is clearly a typo and you also send from @ffwll.ch,
I took the liberty and fixed it for this commit and applied your patch to our internal
branch, Heiko or Vasily will then pick it up for the s390 tree.
Thanks!
> ---
> arch/s390/pci/pci_mmio.c | 98 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> 1 file changed, 57 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/s390/pci/pci_mmio.c b/arch/s390/pci/pci_mmio.c
> index 401cf670a243..1a6adbc68ee8 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/pci/pci_mmio.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/pci/pci_mmio.c
> @@ -119,33 +119,15 @@ static inline int __memcpy_toio_inuser(void __iomem *dst,
> return rc;
> }
>
> -static long get_pfn(unsigned long user_addr, unsigned long access,
> - unsigned long *pfn)
> -{
> - struct vm_area_struct *vma;
> - long ret;
> -
> - mmap_read_lock(current->mm);
> - ret = -EINVAL;
> - vma = find_vma(current->mm, user_addr);
> - if (!vma)
> - goto out;
> - ret = -EACCES;
> - if (!(vma->vm_flags & access))
> - goto out;
> - ret = follow_pfn(vma, user_addr, pfn);
> -out:
> - mmap_read_unlock(current->mm);
> - return ret;
> -}
> -
> SYSCALL_DEFINE3(s390_pci_mmio_write, unsigned long, mmio_addr,
> const void __user *, user_buffer, size_t, length)
> {
> u8 local_buf[64];
> void __iomem *io_addr;
> void *buf;
> - unsigned long pfn;
> + struct vm_area_struct *vma;
> + pte_t *ptep;
> + spinlock_t *ptl;
> long ret;
>
> if (!zpci_is_enabled())
> @@ -158,7 +140,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE3(s390_pci_mmio_write, unsigned long, mmio_addr,
> * We only support write access to MIO capable devices if we are on
> * a MIO enabled system. Otherwise we would have to check for every
> * address if it is a special ZPCI_ADDR and would have to do
> - * a get_pfn() which we don't need for MIO capable devices. Currently
> + * a pfn lookup which we don't need for MIO capable devices. Currently
> * ISM devices are the only devices without MIO support and there is no
> * known need for accessing these from userspace.
> */
> @@ -176,21 +158,37 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE3(s390_pci_mmio_write, unsigned long, mmio_addr,
> } else
> buf = local_buf;
>
> - ret = get_pfn(mmio_addr, VM_WRITE, &pfn);
> + ret = -EFAULT;
> + if (copy_from_user(buf, user_buffer, length))
> + goto out_free;
> +
> + mmap_read_lock(current->mm);
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + vma = find_vma(current->mm, mmio_addr);
> + if (!vma)
> + goto out_unlock_mmap;
> + if (!(vma->vm_flags & (VM_IO | VM_PFNMAP)))
> + goto out_unlock_mmap;
> + ret = -EACCES;
> + if (!(vma->vm_flags & VM_WRITE))
> + goto out_unlock_mmap;
> +
> + ret = follow_pte_pmd(vma->vm_mm, mmio_addr, NULL, &ptep, NULL, &ptl);
> if (ret)
> - goto out;
> - io_addr = (void __iomem *)((pfn << PAGE_SHIFT) |
> + goto out_unlock_mmap;
> +
> + io_addr = (void __iomem *)((pte_pfn(*ptep) << PAGE_SHIFT) |
> (mmio_addr & ~PAGE_MASK));
>
> - ret = -EFAULT;
> if ((unsigned long) io_addr < ZPCI_IOMAP_ADDR_BASE)
> - goto out;
> -
> - if (copy_from_user(buf, user_buffer, length))
> - goto out;
> + goto out_unlock_pt;
>
> ret = zpci_memcpy_toio(io_addr, buf, length);
> -out:
> +out_unlock_pt:
> + pte_unmap_unlock(ptep, ptl);
> +out_unlock_mmap:
> + mmap_read_unlock(current->mm);
> +out_free:
> if (buf != local_buf)
> kfree(buf);
> return ret;
> @@ -274,7 +272,9 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE3(s390_pci_mmio_read, unsigned long, mmio_addr,
> u8 local_buf[64];
> void __iomem *io_addr;
> void *buf;
> - unsigned long pfn;
> + struct vm_area_struct *vma;
> + pte_t *ptep;
> + spinlock_t *ptl;
> long ret;
>
> if (!zpci_is_enabled())
> @@ -287,7 +287,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE3(s390_pci_mmio_read, unsigned long, mmio_addr,
> * We only support read access to MIO capable devices if we are on
> * a MIO enabled system. Otherwise we would have to check for every
> * address if it is a special ZPCI_ADDR and would have to do
> - * a get_pfn() which we don't need for MIO capable devices. Currently
> + * a pfn lookup which we don't need for MIO capable devices. Currently
> * ISM devices are the only devices without MIO support and there is no
> * known need for accessing these from userspace.
> */
> @@ -306,22 +306,38 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE3(s390_pci_mmio_read, unsigned long, mmio_addr,
> buf = local_buf;
> }
>
> - ret = get_pfn(mmio_addr, VM_READ, &pfn);
> + mmap_read_lock(current->mm);
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + vma = find_vma(current->mm, mmio_addr);
> + if (!vma)
> + goto out_unlock_mmap;
> + if (!(vma->vm_flags & (VM_IO | VM_PFNMAP)))
> + goto out_unlock_mmap;
> + ret = -EACCES;
> + if (!(vma->vm_flags & VM_WRITE))
> + goto out_unlock_mmap;
> +
> + ret = follow_pte_pmd(vma->vm_mm, mmio_addr, NULL, &ptep, NULL, &ptl);
> if (ret)
> - goto out;
> - io_addr = (void __iomem *)((pfn << PAGE_SHIFT) | (mmio_addr & ~PAGE_MASK));
> + goto out_unlock_mmap;
> +
> + io_addr = (void __iomem *)((pte_pfn(*ptep) << PAGE_SHIFT) |
> + (mmio_addr & ~PAGE_MASK));
>
> if ((unsigned long) io_addr < ZPCI_IOMAP_ADDR_BASE) {
> ret = -EFAULT;
> - goto out;
> + goto out_unlock_pt;
> }
> ret = zpci_memcpy_fromio(buf, io_addr, length);
> - if (ret)
> - goto out;
> - if (copy_to_user(user_buffer, buf, length))
> +
> +out_unlock_pt:
> + pte_unmap_unlock(ptep, ptl);
> +out_unlock_mmap:
> + mmap_read_unlock(current->mm);
> +
> + if (!ret && copy_to_user(user_buffer, buf, length))
> ret = -EFAULT;
>
> -out:
> if (buf != local_buf)
> kfree(buf);
> return ret;
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists