[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201021102724.GC20749@veeam.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 13:27:24 +0300
From: Sergei Shtepa <sergei.shtepa@...am.com>
To: Damien Le Moal <Damien.LeMoal@....com>
CC: "axboe@...nel.dk" <axboe@...nel.dk>,
"viro@...iv.linux.org.uk" <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
"hch@...radead.org" <hch@...radead.org>,
"darrick.wong@...cle.com" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>,
"linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org" <linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
"rjw@...ysocki.net" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
"len.brown@...el.com" <len.brown@...el.com>,
"pavel@....cz" <pavel@....cz>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Johannes Thumshirn <Johannes.Thumshirn@....com>,
"ming.lei@...hat.com" <ming.lei@...hat.com>,
"jack@...e.cz" <jack@...e.cz>, "tj@...nel.org" <tj@...nel.org>,
"gustavo@...eddedor.com" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>,
"bvanassche@....org" <bvanassche@....org>,
"osandov@...com" <osandov@...com>,
"koct9i@...il.com" <koct9i@...il.com>,
"steve@....org" <steve@....org>,
"linux-block@...r.kernel.org" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Block layer filter - second version
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL - ok.
#ifdef CONFIG_BLK_FILTER or IS_ENABLED() - It's a matter of habit.
> double blank line
Ok, I did.
Looks like a candidate for ./scripts/checkpatch.pl.
> Separate into multiple patches: one that introduces the filter
> functions/ops code and another that changes the block layer where needed.
I'll think about it. Personally, it seems to me that this separation
does not make it easier to understand the code.
It is important for me to know immediately where the function is called,
and this determines its behavior.
--
Sergei Shtepa
Veeam Software developer.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists