[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e876421c-dfeb-e853-1b65-53a786e9bcf9@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 13:00:54 +0100
From: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
To: Cheng-yi Chiang <cychiang@...omium.org>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Taniya Das <tdas@...eaurora.org>,
Rohit kumar <rohitkr@...eaurora.org>,
Banajit Goswami <bgoswami@...eaurora.org>,
Patrick Lai <plai@...eaurora.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
Stephan Gerhold <stephan@...hold.net>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Srinivasa Rao <srivasam@...eaurora.org>,
Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Dylan Reid <dgreid@...omium.org>,
Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@...omium.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:SOUND - SOC LAYER / DYNAMIC AUDIO POWER MANAGEM..."
<alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
Ajye Huang <ajye_huang@...pal.corp-partner.google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 2/3] ASoC: qcom: dt-bindings: Add sc7180 machine
bindings
On 20/10/2020 19:54, Cheng-yi Chiang wrote:
>> Not with the compatible string!
>>
>> Currently card name, and long name are exactly same in all Qualcomm
>> soundcards, which makes it very difficult to identify how those boards
>> re wired up at UCM2 level. So the plan is to properly populate card long
>> name with "model" property which can include details on how things are
>> wiredup on that board.
>>
>> --srini
> Hi Srini,
> Thanks for taking a look.
> Let me try to clarify your comments in case there is any misunderstanding.
>
> I understand your request on having different board variations using
> different sound card names through model property, and I totally agree
> with that.
> As for compatible strings, do you insist on having all the board
> variations using exactly the same compatible string ?
For example if we set below property for sound card in Device tree
model = "RB5";
We will end up with
# cat /proc/asound/cards
0 [RB5 ]: RB5 - RB5
RB5
This is totally not very useful w.r.t UCM2 and makes it very difficult
to common up parts of the configs.
My suggestions are.
1. set card->driver_name to something more sensible in your sound card
driver.
ex:
card->driver_name = "SM8250";
2. set long name in model DT property and set it as card long name
ex:
in DT:
model = "Qualcomm-RB5-WSA8815-Speakers-DMIC0";
in sound driver or common.c:
of_property_read_string_index(np, "model", 0, &card->long_name);
With this set:
now
# cat /proc/asound/cards
0 [QualcommRB5WSA8]: SM8250 - Qualcomm-RB5-WSA8815-Speakers-D
Qualcomm-RB5-WSA8815-Speakers-DMIC0
This also means that in UCM2 we can have a top level SM8250 directory
which can contain other board variants something like:
ucm2/Qualcomm/sm8250/Qualcomm-RB5-WSA8815-Speakers-DMIC0.conf
ucm2/Qualcomm/sm8250/Qualcomm-RB5-WSA8810-Speakers-DMIC123.conf
and so on!
Finally Only comment I had regarding compatible was not to encapsulate
the connection details in it!. these can be made more sensible,
something like
"qcom,sc7180-trogdor-v1", "qcom,sc7180-trogdor-v2".. and so on.
This compatible has nothing to do with driver or card short and long name.
Does that makes sense?
Thanks,
srini
with
Currently if
Powered by blists - more mailing lists