linux-kernel - [PATCH v3 5/6] kunit: test: fix remaining kernel-doc warnings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1c36d295423c5c20c21a7edede0eb29e338dd62a.1603282193.git.mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 21 Oct 2020 14:17:26 +0200
From:   Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>
To:     Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>,
        "Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@....net>,
        Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@...cle.com>,
        Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>,
        Iurii Zaikin <yzaikin@...gle.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, kunit-dev@...glegroups.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 5/6] kunit: test: fix remaining kernel-doc warnings

test.h still produce three warnings:

	include/kunit/test.h:282: warning: Function parameter or member '__suites' not described in 'kunit_test_suites_for_module'
	include/kunit/test.h:282: warning: Excess function parameter 'suites_list' description in 'kunit_test_suites_for_module'
	include/kunit/test.h:314: warning: Excess function parameter 'suites' description in 'kunit_test_suites'

They're all due to errors at kernel-doc markups. Update them.

It should be noticed that this patch moved a kernel-doc
markup that were located at the wrong place, and using a wrong
name. Kernel-doc only supports kaving the markup just before the
function/macro declaration. Placing it elsewhere will make it do
wrong assumptions.

Fixes: aac35468ca20 ("kunit: test: create a single centralized executor for all tests")
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>
---
 include/kunit/test.h | 16 ++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/kunit/test.h b/include/kunit/test.h
index a423fffefea0..14224baca3be 100644
--- a/include/kunit/test.h
+++ b/include/kunit/test.h
@@ -252,13 +252,14 @@ static inline int kunit_run_all_tests(void)
 }
 #endif /* IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_KUNIT) */
 
+#ifdef MODULE
 /**
- * kunit_test_suites() - used to register one or more &struct kunit_suite
- *			 with KUnit.
+ * kunit_test_suites_for_module() - used to register one or more
+ * 			 &struct kunit_suite with KUnit.
  *
- * @suites_list...: a statically allocated list of &struct kunit_suite.
+ * @__suites: a statically allocated list of &struct kunit_suite.
  *
- * Registers @suites_list with the test framework. See &struct kunit_suite for
+ * Registers @__suites with the test framework. See &struct kunit_suite for
  * more information.
  *
  * If a test suite is built-in, module_init() gets translated into
@@ -267,7 +268,6 @@ static inline int kunit_run_all_tests(void)
  * module_{init|exit} functions for the builtin case when registering
  * suites via kunit_test_suites() below.
  */
-#ifdef MODULE
 #define kunit_test_suites_for_module(__suites)				\
 	static int __init kunit_test_suites_init(void)			\
 	{								\
@@ -294,7 +294,7 @@ static inline int kunit_run_all_tests(void)
  * kunit_test_suites() - used to register one or more &struct kunit_suite
  *			 with KUnit.
  *
- * @suites: a statically allocated list of &struct kunit_suite.
+ * @__suites: a statically allocated list of &struct kunit_suite.
  *
  * Registers @suites with the test framework. See &struct kunit_suite for
  * more information.
@@ -308,10 +308,10 @@ static inline int kunit_run_all_tests(void)
  * module.
  *
  */
-#define kunit_test_suites(...)						\
+#define kunit_test_suites(__suites...)						\
 	__kunit_test_suites(__UNIQUE_ID(array),				\
 			    __UNIQUE_ID(suites),			\
-			    __VA_ARGS__)
+			    ##__suites)
 
 #define kunit_test_suite(suite)	kunit_test_suites(&suite)
 
-- 
2.26.2