linux-kernel - Re: cgroup and FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE: WARNING: CPU: 13 PID: 2438 at mm/page_counter.c:57 page_counter

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 21 Oct 2020 14:42:04 +0200
From:   David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To:     Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
        Mina Almasry <almasrymina@...gle.com>
Cc:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@...hat.com>,
        "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
        Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>,
        "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: cgroup and FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE: WARNING: CPU: 13 PID: 2438 at
 mm/page_counter.c:57 page_counter_uncharge+0x4b/0x5

On 21.10.20 05:35, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> On 10/20/20 6:38 AM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>
>> I'm bisecting the warning right now. Looks like it was introduced in v5.7.
> 

So bisecting nailed it down to one of

353b2de42e84 mm/hugetlb.c: clean code by removing unnecessary initialization
a9b3f867404b hugetlb: support file_region coalescing again
08cf9faf7558 hugetlb_cgroup: support noreserve mappings
075a61d07a8e hugetlb_cgroup: add accounting for shared mappings
0db9d74ed884 hugetlb: disable region_add file_region coalescing
e9fe92ae0cd2 hugetlb_cgroup: add reservation accounting for private mappings
9808895e1a44 mm/hugetlb_cgroup: fix hugetlb_cgroup migration
1adc4d419aa2 hugetlb_cgroup: add interface for charge/uncharge hugetlb
reservations
cdc2fcfea79b hugetlb_cgroup: add hugetlb_cgroup reservation counter

So seems to be broken right from the beginning of
charge/uncharge/reservations. Not a surpise when looking at your fixes :)


> I found the following bugs in the cgroup reservation accounting.  The ones
> in region_del are pretty obvious as the number of pages to uncharge would
> always be zero.  The one on alloc_huge_page needs racing code to expose.
> 
> With these fixes, my testing is showing consistent/correct results for
> hugetlb reservation cgroup accounting.
> 
> It would be good if Mina (at least) would look these over.  Would also
> be interesting to know if these fixes address the bug seen with the qemu
> use case.

I strongly suspect it will. Compiling, will reply in half an our or so
with the result.

> 
> I'm still doing more testing and code inspection to look for other issues.

When sending, can you make sure to credit Michal P.? Thanks!

Reported-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@...hat.com>

> 
> From 861bcd7d0443f18a5fed3c3ddc5f1c71e78c4ef4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>
> Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 20:21:42 -0700
> Subject: [PATCH] hugetlb_cgroup: fix reservation accounting
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>
> ---
>  mm/hugetlb.c | 15 +++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
> index 67fc6383995b..c92366313780 100644
> --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
> +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
> @@ -685,17 +685,17 @@ static long region_del(struct resv_map *resv, long f, long t)
>  		}
>  
>  		if (f <= rg->from) {	/* Trim beginning of region */
> -			del += t - rg->from;
> -			rg->from = t;
> -
>  			hugetlb_cgroup_uncharge_file_region(resv, rg,
>  							    t - rg->from);
> -		} else {		/* Trim end of region */
> -			del += rg->to - f;
> -			rg->to = f;
>  
> +			del += t - rg->from;
> +			rg->from = t;
> +		} else {		/* Trim end of region */
>  			hugetlb_cgroup_uncharge_file_region(resv, rg,
>  							    rg->to - f);
> +
> +			del += rg->to - f;
> +			rg->to = f;

Those two look very correct to me.

You could keep computing "del" before the uncharge, similar to the /*
Remove entire region */ case.

>  		}
>  	}
>  
> @@ -2454,6 +2454,9 @@ struct page *alloc_huge_page(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>  
>  		rsv_adjust = hugepage_subpool_put_pages(spool, 1);
>  		hugetlb_acct_memory(h, -rsv_adjust);
> +		if (deferred_reserve)
> +			hugetlb_cgroup_uncharge_page_rsvd(hstate_index(h),
> +					

That looks correct to me as well.

>  	}
>  	return page;
>  
> 

Thanks for debugging!

-- 
Thanks,

David / dhildenb