linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 09/10] KVM: VMX: Skip additional Hyper-V TLB EPTP flushes if one fails

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87lffz4q14.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com>
Date:   Wed, 21 Oct 2020 16:22:47 +0200
From:   Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
To:     Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
Cc:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 09/10] KVM: VMX: Skip additional Hyper-V TLB EPTP flushes if one fails

Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com> writes:

> Skip additional EPTP flushes if one fails when processing EPTPs for
> Hyper-V's paravirt TLB flushing.  If _any_ flush fails, KVM falls back
> to a full global flush, i.e. additional flushes are unnecessary (and
> will likely fail anyways).
>
> Continue processing the loop unless a mismatch was already detected,
> e.g. to handle the case where the first flush fails and there is a
> yet-to-be-detected mismatch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 6 +++++-
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> index a45a90d44d24..e0fea09a6e42 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> @@ -517,7 +517,11 @@ static int hv_remote_flush_tlb_with_range(struct kvm *kvm,
>  			else
>  				mismatch = true;
>  
> -			ret |= hv_remote_flush_eptp(tmp_eptp, range);
> +			if (!ret)
> +				ret = hv_remote_flush_eptp(tmp_eptp, range);
> +
> +			if (ret && mismatch)
> +				break;
>  		}
>  		if (mismatch)
>  			kvm_vmx->hv_tlb_eptp = INVALID_PAGE;

In case my suggestion on PATCH5 gets dismissed,

Reviewed-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>

-- 
Vitaly