[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMM=eLf+2VYHB6vZVjn_=GA5uXJWKL-d6PuCpHEBPz=_Loe58A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 10:24:05 -0400
From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Cc: "Nabeel Meeramohideen Mohamed (nmeeramohide)"
<nmeeramohide@...ron.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-block@...r.kernel.org" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org>,
"Steve Moyer (smoyer)" <smoyer@...ron.com>,
"Greg Becker (gbecker)" <gbecker@...ron.com>,
"Pierre Labat (plabat)" <plabat@...ron.com>,
"John Groves (jgroves)" <jgroves@...ron.com>,
device-mapper development <dm-devel@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v2 00/22] add Object Storage Media Pool (mpool)
Hey Dan,
On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 6:38 PM Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 2:59 PM Nabeel Meeramohideen Mohamed
> (nmeeramohide) <nmeeramohide@...ron.com> wrote:
>
> > (5) Representing an mpool as a /dev/mpool/<mpool-name> device file provides a
> > convenient mechanism for controlling access to and managing the multiple storage
> > volumes, and in the future pmem devices, that may comprise an logical mpool.
>
> Christoph and I have talked about replacing the pmem driver's
> dependence on device-mapper for pooling.
Was this discussion done publicly or private? If public please share
a pointer to the thread.
I'd really like to understand the problem statement that is leading to
pursuing a pmem native alternative to existing DM.
Thanks,
Mike
Powered by blists - more mailing lists