[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201021163702.GM36674@ziepe.ca>
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 13:37:02 -0300
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>
Cc: DRI Development <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
KVM list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:DMA BUFFER SHARING FRAMEWORK"
<linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-s390 <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...el.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Linux PCI <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 12/16] PCI: Obey iomem restrictions for procfs mmap
On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 05:54:54PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> The trouble is that io_remap_pfn adjust vma->pgoff, so we'd need to
> split that. So ideally ->mmap would never set up any ptes.
/dev/mem makes pgoff == pfn so it doesn't get changed by remap.
pgoff doesn't get touched for MAP_SHARED either, so there are other
users that could work like this - eg anyone mmaping IO memory is
probably OK.
> I guess one option would be if remap_pfn_range would steal the
> vma->vm_ops pointer for itself, then it could set up the correct
> ->install_ptes hook. But there's tons of callers for that, so not sure
> that's a bright idea.
The caller has to check that the mapping is still live, and I think
hold a lock across the remap? Auto-defering it doesn't seem feasible.
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists