linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] Documentation: kunit: Update Kconfig parts for KUNIT's module support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201021191757.29007-1-sjpark@amazon.com>
Date:   Wed, 21 Oct 2020 21:17:57 +0200
From:   SeongJae Park <sjpark@...zon.com>
To:     David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
CC:     SeongJae Park <sjpark@...zon.com>,
        Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>,
        SeongJae Park <sjpark@...zon.de>,
        "Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@....net>,
        Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" 
        <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
        "KUnit Development" <kunit-dev@...glegroups.com>,
        "open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Documentation: kunit: Update Kconfig parts for KUNIT's module support

On Wed, 21 Oct 2020 12:06:13 +0800 David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 2:38 PM 'SeongJae Park' via KUnit Development
> <kunit-dev@...glegroups.com> wrote:
> >
> > From: SeongJae Park <sjpark@...zon.de>
> >
> > If 'CONFIG_KUNIT=m', letting kunit tests that do not support loadable
> > module build depends on 'KUNIT' instead of 'KUNIT=y' result in compile
> > errors.  This commit updates the document for this.
> >
> > Fixes: 9fe124bf1b77 ("kunit: allow kunit to be loaded as a module")
> > Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sjpark@...zon.de>
> 
> Sorry for the delay in looking at this. Apart from another minuscule
> typo below, this looks good to me.
> 
> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>

Thanks!

> 
> Cheers,
> -- David
> 
> > ---
> >
> > Changes from v1
> > (https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20201012105420.5945-1-sjpark@amazon.com/):
> > - Fix a typo (Marco Elver)
> >
> > ---
> >  Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/start.rst | 2 +-
> >  Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst | 5 +++++
> >  2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/start.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/start.rst
> > index d23385e3e159..454f307813ea 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/start.rst
> > +++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/start.rst
> > @@ -197,7 +197,7 @@ Now add the following to ``drivers/misc/Kconfig``:
> >
> >         config MISC_EXAMPLE_TEST
> >                 bool "Test for my example"
> > -               depends on MISC_EXAMPLE && KUNIT
> > +               depends on MISC_EXAMPLE && KUNIT=y
> >
> >  and the following to ``drivers/misc/Makefile``:
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst
> > index 3c3fe8b5fecc..b331f5a5b0b9 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst
> > +++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst
> > @@ -556,6 +556,11 @@ Once the kernel is built and installed, a simple
> >
> >  ...will run the tests.
> >
> > +.. note::
> > +   Note that you should make your test depends on ``KUNIT=y`` in Kconfig if the
> nit: Grammatically, this should technically be either "depend" (2nd
> person), or something like "make sure [that] your test depends".

Good eye!  I will fix this in the next version.


Thanks,
SeongJae Park