[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201021194257.GC2158081@oden.dyn.berto.se>
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 21:42:57 +0200
From: Niklas Söderlund
<niklas.soderlund@...natech.se>
To: Tian Tao <tiantao6@...ilicon.com>
Cc: rui.zhang@...el.com, daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, amitk@...nel.org,
linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] thermal: replace spin_lock_irqsave by spin_lock in hard
IRQ
Hi Tian,
Thanks for your work.
On 2020-10-21 11:05:30 +0800, Tian Tao wrote:
> The code has been in a irq-disabled context since it is hard IRQ. There
> is no necessity to do it again.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tian Tao <tiantao6@...ilicon.com>
Tested-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund+renesas@...natech.se>
> ---
> drivers/thermal/rcar_thermal.c | 5 ++---
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/rcar_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/rcar_thermal.c
> index 5c2a13b..6ae757d 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/rcar_thermal.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/rcar_thermal.c
> @@ -409,16 +409,15 @@ static irqreturn_t rcar_thermal_irq(int irq, void *data)
> {
> struct rcar_thermal_common *common = data;
> struct rcar_thermal_priv *priv;
> - unsigned long flags;
> u32 status, mask;
>
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&common->lock, flags);
> + spin_lock(&common->lock);
>
> mask = rcar_thermal_common_read(common, INTMSK);
> status = rcar_thermal_common_read(common, STR);
> rcar_thermal_common_write(common, STR, 0x000F0F0F & mask);
>
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&common->lock, flags);
> + spin_unlock(&common->lock);
>
> status = status & ~mask;
>
> --
> 2.7.4
>
--
Regards,
Niklas Söderlund
Powered by blists - more mailing lists