linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] vmlinux.lds.h: Keep .ctors.* with .ctors

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <202010211304.60EF97AF2@keescook>
Date:   Wed, 21 Oct 2020 13:09:00 -0700
From:   Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To:     Fāng-ruì Sòng <maskray@...gle.com>
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>,
        linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] vmlinux.lds.h: Keep .ctors.* with .ctors

On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 09:53:39PM -0700, Fāng-ruì Sòng wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 4:04 PM Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
> > > index 5430febd34be..b83c00c63997 100644
> > > --- a/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h
> > > +++ b/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h
> > > @@ -684,6 +684,7 @@
> > >  #ifdef CONFIG_CONSTRUCTORS
> > >  #define KERNEL_CTORS()       . = ALIGN(8);                      \
> > >                       __ctors_start = .;                 \
> > > +                     KEEP(*(SORT(.ctors.*)))            \
> > >                       KEEP(*(.ctors))                    \
> > >                       KEEP(*(SORT(.init_array.*)))       \
> > >                       KEEP(*(.init_array))               \
> > > --
> > > 2.25.1
> 
> I think it would be great to figure out why these .ctors.* .dtors.* are generated.

I haven't had the time to investigate. This patch keeps sfr's builds
from regressing, so we need at least this first.

> ~GCC 4.7 switched to default to .init_array/.fini_array if libc
> supports it. I have some refactoring in this area of Clang as well
> (e.g. https://reviews.llvm.org/D71393)
> 
> And I am not sure SORT(.init_array.*) or SORT(.ctors.*) will work. The
> correct construct is SORT_BY_INIT_PRIORITY(.init_array.*)

The kernel doesn't seem to use the init_priority attribute at all. Are
you saying the cause of the .ctors.* names are a result of some internal
use of init_priority by the compiler here?

-- 
Kees Cook