[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFd5g44dGaKyDQGPeanE1G8MPzVdVkqbWjJhj+nQJGUgkezz9g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 14:15:32 -0700
From: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
Iurii Zaikin <yzaikin@...gle.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@...sares.net>,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext: EXT4_KUNIT_TESTS should depend on EXT4_FS instead of
selecting it
On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 12:37 AM Geert Uytterhoeven
<geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
>
> EXT4_KUNIT_TESTS selects EXT4_FS, thus enabling an optional feature the
> user may not want to enable. Fix this by making the test depend on
> EXT4_FS instead.
>
> Fixes: 1cbeab1b242d16fd ("ext4: add kunit test for decoding extended timestamps")
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
If I remember correctly, having EXT4_KUNIT_TESTS select EXT4_FS was
something that Ted specifically requested, but I don't have any strong
feelings on it either way.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists