[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BY5PR04MB6705D719530D5E188ECB724EFC1D0@BY5PR04MB6705.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 06:37:55 +0000
From: Avri Altman <Avri.Altman@....com>
To: Can Guo <cang@...eaurora.org>,
"asutoshd@...eaurora.org" <asutoshd@...eaurora.org>,
"nguyenb@...eaurora.org" <nguyenb@...eaurora.org>,
"hongwus@...eaurora.org" <hongwus@...eaurora.org>,
"rnayak@...eaurora.org" <rnayak@...eaurora.org>,
"linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
"kernel-team@...roid.com" <kernel-team@...roid.com>,
"saravanak@...gle.com" <saravanak@...gle.com>,
"salyzyn@...gle.com" <salyzyn@...gle.com>
CC: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>,
Bean Huo <beanhuo@...ron.com>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 1/1] scsi: ufs: Fix unexpected values get from
ufshcd_read_desc_param()
> Since WB feature has been added, WB related sysfs entries can be accessed
> even when an UFS device does not support WB feature. In that case, the
> descriptors which are not supported by the UFS device may be wrongly
> reported when they are accessed from their corrsponding sysfs entries.
> Fix it by adding a sanity check of parameter offset against the actual
> decriptor length.s
This should be a bug fix IMO, and be dealt with similarly like ufshcd_is_wb_attrs or ufshcd_is_wb_flag.
Thanks,
Avri
Powered by blists - more mailing lists