| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <nycvar.YFH.7.76.2010221205110.18859@cbobk.fhfr.pm>
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 12:05:41 +0200 (CEST)
From: Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>
To: Sandeep Singh <Sandeep.Singh@....com>
cc: benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com,
jic23@...nel.org, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, hdegoede@...hat.com,
Nehal-bakulchandra.Shah@....com, andy.shevchenko@...il.com,
mail@...hard-neumann.de, m.felsch@...gutronix.de,
rdunlap@...radead.org, Shyam-sundar.S-k@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/4] SFH: Add Support for AMD Sensor Fusion Hub
On Sat, 10 Oct 2020, Sandeep Singh wrote:
> From: Sandeep Singh <sandeep.singh@....com>
>
> AMD SFH(Sensor Fusion Hub) is HID based driver.SFH FW is part of MP2
> processor (MP2 which is an ARM core connected to x86 for processing
> sensor data) and it runs on MP2 where in the driver resides on X86.
> The driver functionalities are divided into three parts:-
>
> 1: amd-mp2-pcie:- This part of the module will communicate with MP2
> firmware. MP2 which is exposed as a PCI device to the
> X86, uses mailboxes to talk to MP2 firmware to
> send/receive commands.
> 2: Client Layer:- This part of the driver will use DRAM data and convert
> the data into HID format based on HID reports.
> 3: Transport layer :- This part of the driver the will communicate with HID
> core.Communication between devices and HID core is
> mostly done via HID reports
>
> In terms of architecture, it resembles like ISH (Intel Integrated Sensor
> Hub). However the major difference is all the hid reports are generated
> as part of the kernel driver.
>
> AMD SFH is integrated as a part of SoC, starting from 17h family of
> processors. The solution is working well on several OEM products.
> AMD SFH uses HID over PCIe bus.
>
> Changes since v1:
> -> Fix auto build test warnings
> -> Fix smatch warnings "possible memory leak" -Reported by Dan
> carpenter
>
> Links of the review comments for v1:
> [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11325163/
> [2] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11325167/
> [3] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11325171/
> [4] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11325187/
>
> Changes since v2:
> -> Debugfs divided into another patch
> -> Fix some cosmetic changes
> -> Fix for review comments
> Reported and Suggested by:- Srinivas Pandruvada
>
> Links of the review comments for v2:
> [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11355491/
> [2] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11355495/
> [3] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11355499/
> [4] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11355503/
>
> Changes since v3:
> -> Removed debugfs suggested by - Benjamin Tissoires
>
> Links of the review comments for v3:
> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/2/11/1256
> [2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/2/11/1257
> [3] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/2/11/1258
> [4] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/2/11/1259
> [5] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/2/11/1260
>
> Changes since v4:
> -> use PCI managed calls.
> -> use kernel APIs
>
> Links of the review comments for v4:
> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/2/26/1360
> [2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/2/26/1361
> [3] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/2/26/1362
> [4] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/2/26/1363
> [5] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/2/27/1
> Changes since v5
> -> Fix for review comments by: Andy Shevchenko
> -> Fix for indentations erros, NULL pointer,Redundant assignment
> -> Drop LOCs in many location
> -> Create as a single driver module instead of two modules.
>
> Links of the review comments for v5:
> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/5/29/589
> [2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/5/29/590
> [3] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/5/29/606
> [4] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/5/29/632
> [5] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/5/29/633
>
> Changes since v6
> -> fix Kbuild warning "warning: ignoring return value of
> 'pcim_enable_device',
> -> Removed select HID and add depends on HID
>
> Links of the review comments for v6:
> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/8/9/58
> [2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/8/9/59
> [3] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/8/9/125
> [4] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/8/9/61
> [5] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/8/9/91
>
> Changes since v7
> -> Add Co-deveploed-by
> -> Build the Documentation
> -> Fix cosmatic changes
> -> Add init function inside probe function
> -> Use devm_add_action_or_reset() to avoids the remove()
> callback.
>
> Links of the review comments for v7:
> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/8/10/1221
> [2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/8/10/1222
> [3] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/8/10/1223
> [4] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/8/10/1224
> [5] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/8/10/1225
>
> Sandeep Singh (4):
> SFH: Add maintainers and documentation for AMD SFH based on HID
> framework
> SFH: PCIe driver to add support of AMD sensor fusion hub
> SFH:Transport Driver to add support of AMD Sensor Fusion Hub (SFH)
> SFH: Create HID report to Enable support of AMD sensor fusion Hub
> (SFH)
I have now applied the series to hid.git#for-5.11/amd-sfh-hid. Thanks for
all the efforts in tidying this up,
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists