lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 22 Oct 2020 18:19:37 +0530
From:   Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@...eaurora.org>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
        Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, coresight@...ts.linaro.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 2/4] coresight: tmc-etf: Fix NULL ptr dereference in
 tmc_enable_etf_sink_perf()

On 2020-10-22 17:02, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 04:27:52PM +0530, Sai Prakash Ranjan wrote:
> 
>> Looking at the ETR and other places in the kernel, ETF and the
>> ETB are the only places trying to dereference the task(owner)
>> in tmc_enable_etf_sink_perf() which is also called from the
>> sched_in path as in the call trace.
> 
>> @@ -391,6 +392,10 @@ static void *tmc_alloc_etf_buffer(struct 
>> coresight_device *csdev,
>>  {
>>  	int node;
>>  	struct cs_buffers *buf;
>> +	struct task_struct *task = READ_ONCE(event->owner);
>> +
>> +	if (!task || is_kernel_event(event))
>> +		return NULL;
> 
> 
> This is *wrong*... why do you care about who owns the events?
> 

The original issue was the owner being NULL and causing
a NULL pointer dereference. I did ask some time back
if it is valid for the owner to be NULL [1] and should
probably be handled in events core?

[1] 
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/c0e1f99a0a2480dfc8d788bb424d3f08@codeaurora.org/

Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 
0000000000000548
Mem abort info:
   ESR = 0x96000006
   EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits
   SET = 0, FnV = 0
   EA = 0, S1PTW = 0
Data abort info:
   ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000006
   CM = 0, WnR = 0
<snip>...
Call trace:
  tmc_enable_etf_sink+0xe4/0x280
  coresight_enable_path+0x168/0x1fc
  etm_event_start+0x8c/0xf8
  etm_event_add+0x38/0x54
  event_sched_in+0x194/0x2ac
  group_sched_in+0x54/0x12c
  flexible_sched_in+0xd8/0x120
  visit_groups_merge+0x100/0x16c
  ctx_flexible_sched_in+0x50/0x74
  ctx_sched_in+0xa4/0xa8
  perf_event_sched_in+0x60/0x6c
  perf_event_context_sched_in+0x98/0xe0
  __perf_event_task_sched_in+0x5c/0xd8
  finish_task_switch+0x184/0x1cc
  schedule_tail+0x20/0xec
  ret_from_fork+0x4/0x18


Thanks,
Sai

-- 
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a 
member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ