[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201022030217.GA2105@hoboy.vegasvil.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 20:02:17 -0700
From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
To: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
Cc: Christian Eggers <ceggers@...i.de>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Helmut Grohne <helmut.grohne@...enta.de>,
Paul Barker <pbarker@...sulko.com>,
Codrin Ciubotariu <codrin.ciubotariu@...rochip.com>,
George McCollister <george.mccollister@...il.com>,
Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>,
Tristram Ha <Tristram.Ha@...rochip.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Woojung Huh <woojung.huh@...rochip.com>,
Microchip Linux Driver Support <UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 7/9] net: dsa: microchip: ksz9477: add
hardware time stamping support
On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 02:39:35AM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> So how _does_ that work for TI PHYTER?
>
> As far as we understand, the PHYTER appears to autonomously mangle PTP packets
> in the following way:
> - subtracting t2 on RX from the correctionField of the Pdelay_Req
> - adding t3 on TX to the correctionField of the Pdelay_Resp
The Phyter does not support peer-to-peer one step.
The only driver that implements it is ptp_ines.c.
And *that* driver/HW implements it correctly.
Thanks,
Richard
Powered by blists - more mailing lists