[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <281bca2d-d534-1032-eed3-7ee7705cb12c@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 18:37:45 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>
Cc: Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kvm list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: X86: Expose KVM_HINTS_REALTIME in
KVM_GET_SUPPORTED_CPUID
On 22/10/20 18:35, Jim Mattson wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 6:02 AM Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 22/10/20 03:34, Wanpeng Li wrote:
>>> From: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>
>>>
>>> Per KVM_GET_SUPPORTED_CPUID ioctl documentation:
>>>
>>> This ioctl returns x86 cpuid features which are supported by both the
>>> hardware and kvm in its default configuration.
>>>
>>> A well-behaved userspace should not set the bit if it is not supported.
>>>
>>> Suggested-by: Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>
>>
>> It's common for userspace to copy all supported CPUID bits to
>> KVM_SET_CPUID2, I don't think this is the right behavior for
>> KVM_HINTS_REALTIME.
>
> That is not how the API is defined, but I'm sure you know that. :-)
Yes, though in my defense :) KVM_HINTS_REALTIME is not a property of the
kernel, it's a property of the environment that the guest runs in. This
was the original reason to separate it from other feature bits in the
same leaf.
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists