[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <db4f86f30726a1a33c868155b4c681ac25569179.camel@fb.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 12:49:34 -0400
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...com>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
<cgroups@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<kernel-team@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: memcontrol: add file_thp, shmem_thp to memory.stat
On Thu, 2020-10-22 at 11:18 -0400, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> index e80aa9d2db68..334ce608735c 100644
> --- a/mm/filemap.c
> +++ b/mm/filemap.c
> @@ -204,9 +204,9 @@ static void unaccount_page_cache_page(struct
> address_space *mapping,
> if (PageSwapBacked(page)) {
> __mod_lruvec_page_state(page, NR_SHMEM, -nr);
> if (PageTransHuge(page))
> - __dec_node_page_state(page, NR_SHMEM_THPS);
> + __dec_lruvec_page_state(page, NR_SHMEM_THPS);
> } else if (PageTransHuge(page)) {
> - __dec_node_page_state(page, NR_FILE_THPS);
> + __dec_lruvec_page_state(page, NR_FILE_THPS);
> filemap_nr_thps_dec(mapping);
> }
This may be a dumb question, but does that mean the
NR_FILE_THPS number will no longer be visible in
/proc/vmstat or is there some magic I overlooked in
a cursory look of the code?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists