[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201022191248.GP4077@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 22:12:48 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>
Cc: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>,
Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
<linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lib: add basic KUnit test for lib/math
On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 10:10:38PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 09:26:45AM -0700, Daniel Latypov wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 8:06 AM Andy Shevchenko
> > <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 10:47:50AM -0700, Daniel Latypov wrote:
...
> > > Summarize this, please create usable documentation first.
> >
> > Sounds good.
> > I'm generally wary people not reading the docs, and of documentation
> > examples becoming bitrotted faster than actual code.
> > But so far KUnit seems to be doing relatively well on both fronts.
>
> Dunno. As I told, I have created first unit test based on documentation (okay,
> I looked at the code, but you may read this as ratio was 90% doc / 10% existing
> code).
Side note: some cases are not described in doc and produced "interesting"
results that I have to look a lot into KUnit Python wrapper to fix bugs in it.
You may find my patches in the KUnit mailing list.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists