linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] dt-bindings: HID: i2c-hid: Introduce bindings for the Goodix GT7375P

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAD=FV=XnXCL0xrDoxpdaeQv5rut7Vpryor20KR4sHR_344_LcA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 23 Oct 2020 16:30:09 -0700
From:   Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To:     Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
        Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Andrea Borgia <andrea@...gia.bo.it>,
        Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@...onical.com>,
        linux-input@...r.kernel.org, Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
        Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
        Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] dt-bindings: HID: i2c-hid: Introduce bindings for
 the Goodix GT7375P

Hi,

On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 4:23 PM Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org> wrote:
>
> +examples:
> +  - |
> +    #include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,rpmh.h>
> +    #include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>
> +    #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>
> +
> +    i2c {
> +      #address-cells = <1>;
> +      #size-cells = <0>;
> +
> +      ap_ts: touchscreen@5d {
> +        compatible = "hid-over-i2c";

You always find one more problem right after you hit send, don't you?
Or is that just me?

Obviously the above should say

compatible = "goodix,gt7375p";

Luckily when I change that "dt_binding_check" still passes.  Whew!

I won't send a v3 yet and I'll wait for feedback.  On the off chance
that there are no other problems with this binding and the maintainer
wants to land this, I don't have any objections to the maintainer
fixing this when the patch lands.

-Doug