[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20201023062003.3353-1-qiang.zhang@windriver.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 14:20:03 +0800
From: qiang.zhang@...driver.com
To: axboe@...nel.dk
Cc: viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
io-uring@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] io-wq: fix 'task->pi_lock' spin lock protect
From: Zqiang <qiang.zhang@...driver.com>
The set CPU affinity func 'do_set_cpus_allowed' may be operate
'task_rq', need add rq lock protect, replace 'pi_lock' spinlock
protect with task_rq_lock func.
Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang.zhang@...driver.com>
---
fs/io-wq.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/io-wq.c b/fs/io-wq.c
index d3165ce339c2..6ea3e0224e63 100644
--- a/fs/io-wq.c
+++ b/fs/io-wq.c
@@ -1209,11 +1209,13 @@ static bool io_wq_worker_affinity(struct io_worker *worker, void *data)
{
struct task_struct *task = worker->task;
unsigned long flags;
+ struct rq_flags rf;
+ struct rq *rq;
- raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&task->pi_lock, flags);
+ rq = task_rq_lock(task, &rf);
do_set_cpus_allowed(task, cpumask_of_node(worker->wqe->node));
task->flags |= PF_NO_SETAFFINITY;
- raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->pi_lock, flags);
+ task_rq_unlock(rq, task, &rf);
return false;
}
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists