lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201023074542.GN2611@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:   Fri, 23 Oct 2020 09:45:42 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Elliot Berman <eberman@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Trilok Soni <tsoni@...eaurora.org>,
        Prasad Sodagudi <psodagud@...eaurora.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] smp: Add bootcpus parameter to boot subset of CPUs

On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 03:04:03PM -0700, Elliot Berman wrote:
> In a heterogeneous multiprocessor system, specifying the 'maxcpus'
> parameter on kernel command line does not provide sufficient control
> over which CPUs are brought online at kernel boot time, since CPUs may
> have nonuniform performance characteristics. Thus, add bootcpus kernel
> parameter to control which CPUs should be brought online during kernel
> boot. When both maxcpus and bootcpus is set, the more restrictive of the
> two are booted.

Why would one wish to do so? Having the ability for abilities sake is no
good.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ