[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201023083752.bvs4oabbsdzlnnip@vireshk-i7>
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 14:07:52 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Hector Yuan <hector.yuan@...iatek.com>
Cc: linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@...nel.org>,
Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@...aro.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@...com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
wsd_upstream@...iatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 5/6] cpufreq: mediatek-hw: Add SVS CPU initialization
On 23-10-20, 16:24, Hector Yuan wrote:
> From: "Hector.Yuan" <hector.yuan@...iatek.com>
>
> Use pm_qos to block cpu-idle state for SVS initializing.
> CPUs must be in power on state when doing SVS.
> Add polling ack while coufreq hw is ready.(SVS init done)
Why is this required ?
And when you send the next version, please send a single patch for the
cpufreq-driver by merging all of these together.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists