linux-kernel - [PATCH v4 07/19] sched: Fix hotplug vs CPU bandwidth control

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201023102346.639538965@infradead.org>
Date:   Fri, 23 Oct 2020 12:12:05 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...nel.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bigeasy@...utronix.de,
        qais.yousef@....com, swood@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org,
        valentin.schneider@....com, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
        vincent.guittot@...aro.org, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
        rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com, mgorman@...e.de,
        bristot@...hat.com, vincent.donnefort@....com, tj@...nel.org,
        ouwen210@...mail.com
Subject: [PATCH v4 07/19] sched: Fix hotplug vs CPU bandwidth control

Since we now migrate tasks away before DYING, we should also move
bandwidth unthrottle, otherwise we can gain tasks from unthrottle
after we expect all tasks to be gone already.

Also; it looks like the RT balancers don't respect cpu_active() and
instead rely on rq->online in part, complete this. This too requires
we do set_rq_offline() earlier to match the cpu_active() semantics.
(The bigger patch is to convert RT to cpu_active() entirely)

Since set_rq_online() is called from sched_cpu_activate(), place
set_rq_offline() in sched_cpu_deactivate().

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
---
 kernel/sched/core.c     |   14 ++++++++++----
 kernel/sched/deadline.c |    5 +----
 kernel/sched/rt.c       |    5 +----
 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -6979,6 +6979,8 @@ int sched_cpu_activate(unsigned int cpu)
 
 int sched_cpu_deactivate(unsigned int cpu)
 {
+	struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
+	struct rq_flags rf;
 	int ret;
 
 	set_cpu_active(cpu, false);
@@ -6993,6 +6995,14 @@ int sched_cpu_deactivate(unsigned int cp
 
 	balance_push_set(cpu, true);
 
+	rq_lock_irqsave(rq, &rf);
+	if (rq->rd) {
+		update_rq_clock(rq);
+		BUG_ON(!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, rq->rd->span));
+		set_rq_offline(rq);
+	}
+	rq_unlock_irqrestore(rq, &rf);
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_SMT
 	/*
 	 * When going down, decrement the number of cores with SMT present.
@@ -7074,10 +7084,6 @@ int sched_cpu_dying(unsigned int cpu)
 	sched_tick_stop(cpu);
 
 	rq_lock_irqsave(rq, &rf);
-	if (rq->rd) {
-		BUG_ON(!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, rq->rd->span));
-		set_rq_offline(rq);
-	}
 	BUG_ON(rq->nr_running != 1);
 	rq_unlock_irqrestore(rq, &rf);
 
--- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
@@ -543,7 +543,7 @@ static int push_dl_task(struct rq *rq);
 
 static inline bool need_pull_dl_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev)
 {
-	return dl_task(prev);
+	return rq->online && dl_task(prev);
 }
 
 static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct callback_head, dl_push_head);
--- a/kernel/sched/rt.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/rt.c
@@ -265,7 +265,7 @@ static void pull_rt_task(struct rq *this
 static inline bool need_pull_rt_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev)
 {
 	/* Try to pull RT tasks here if we lower this rq's prio */
-	return rq->rt.highest_prio.curr > prev->prio;
+	return rq->online && rq->rt.highest_prio.curr > prev->prio;
 }
 
 static inline int rt_overloaded(struct rq *rq)