[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201023103712.GL2594@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 12:37:12 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@...il.com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Javi Merino <javi.merino@...nel.org>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
Amit Kucheria <amitk@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Quentin Perret <qperret@...gle.com>,
Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] thermal: cpufreq_cooling: Reuse sched_cpu_util()
On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 03:50:21PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Several parts of the kernel are already using the effective CPU
> utilization (as seen by the scheduler) to get the current load on the
> CPU, do the same here instead of depending on the idle time of the CPU,
> which isn't that accurate comparatively.
>
> Note that, this (and CPU frequency scaling in general) doesn't work that
> well with idle injection as that is done from rt threads and is counted
> as load while it tries to do quite the opposite. That should be solved
> separately though.
Actual numbers that show the goodness would be nice ;-) Because clearly
we're doing this make it better.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists