linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] Have insn decoder functions return success/failure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20201023194704.f723c86e5f8dfc1133dd5930@kernel.org>
Date:   Fri, 23 Oct 2020 19:47:04 +0900
From:   Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc:     Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, x86-ml <x86@...nel.org>,
        Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Have insn decoder functions return success/failure

On Fri, 23 Oct 2020 11:32:54 +0200
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> wrote:

> On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 06:28:50PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> > OK, would you think we also better to integrate it with insn_init()?
> 
> That kinda makes sense because it would obviate the need to call it
> as user of the interface but simply do insn_decode() which will do
> everything for you. Lemme see how it works out in practice...
> 
> > Borislav, would you handle it? I think you already started.
> 
> Sure, I'll have a poke at it.

Thanks! I look forward to it.

-- 
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>