lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201023114958.GE32486@alley>
Date:   Fri, 23 Oct 2020 13:49:58 +0200
From:   Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
To:     John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>
Cc:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Shreyas Joshi <shreyas.joshi@...mp.com>,
        shreyasjoshi15@...il.com,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/2] printk: Add kernel parameter: mute_console

On Thu 2020-10-22 16:59:15, John Ogness wrote:
> On 2020-10-22, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> wrote:
> > The whole point of the exercise is to disable all consoles, including
> > default ones which are not explicitly specified on the command line.
> 
> In that case I think specifying something like:
> 
>     console=null
> 
> makes that most sense. I think implementing a "null console" driver
> would be quite simple. Then there would be no need for special handling
> in the printk subsystem.

Heh, it actually already exists and has been created for exactly this
purpose, see the commit 3117ff13f104e98b05b6 ("tty: Add NULL TTY
driver").

Regarding the interface:

   + console=null or console= is OK when people do not want consoles
     at all

   + mute_console (or another extra parameter) would be needed if
     people wanted to have login console.

It is true that nobody asked for the login support. So, the null
console should be enough for now.

Best Regards,
Petr

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ