[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <6562A60B-C27C-4912-94AE-6A23839DABF4@canonical.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 20:53:08 +0800
From: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@...onical.com>
To: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
Cc: tiwai@...e.com, Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@...ux.intel.com>,
Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>,
Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
"moderated list:SOUND" <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] ALSA: hda: Stop mangling PCI MSI
> On Oct 23, 2020, at 19:34, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 23 Oct 2020 12:23:36 +0200,
> Kai-Heng Feng wrote:
>>
>> @@ -1038,14 +1036,6 @@ static int azx_suspend(struct device *dev)
>> __azx_runtime_suspend(chip);
>> else
>> pm_runtime_force_suspend(dev);
>> - if (bus->irq >= 0) {
>> - free_irq(bus->irq, chip);
>> - bus->irq = -1;
>> - chip->card->sync_irq = -1;
>> - }
>
> This release of irq has nothing to do with MSI. There has been PCI
> controllers that assign to a different IRQ line after the resume.
Can this issue happened before commit 41017f0cac925 ("[PATCH] PCI: MSI(X) save/restore for suspend/resume") was merged?
Kai-Heng
>
>> - if (azx_acquire_irq(chip, 1) < 0)
>> - return -EIO;
>
> Ditto.
>
>
> thanks,
>
> Takashi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists