[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201023135400.GA2651@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:54:00 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@...lfernandes.org>
Cc: Nishanth Aravamudan <naravamudan@...italocean.com>,
Julien Desfossez <jdesfossez@...italocean.com>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
Vineeth Pillai <viremana@...ux.microsoft.com>,
Aaron Lu <aaron.lwe@...il.com>,
Aubrey Li <aubrey.intel@...il.com>, tglx@...utronix.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, fweisbec@...il.com,
keescook@...omium.org, kerrnel@...gle.com,
Phil Auld <pauld@...hat.com>,
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, vineeth@...byteword.org,
Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@...el.com>,
Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>,
Agata Gruza <agata.gruza@...el.com>,
Antonio Gomez Iglesias <antonio.gomez.iglesias@...el.com>,
graf@...zon.com, konrad.wilk@...cle.com, dfaggioli@...e.com,
pjt@...gle.com, rostedt@...dmis.org, derkling@...gle.com,
benbjiang@...cent.com,
Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@...cle.com>,
James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com, OWeisse@...ch.edu,
Dhaval Giani <dhaval.giani@...cle.com>,
Junaid Shahid <junaids@...gle.com>, jsbarnes@...gle.com,
chris.hyser@...cle.com,
Vineeth Remanan Pillai <vpillai@...italocean.com>,
Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@...ux.intel.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 -tip 06/26] sched: Add core wide task selection and
scheduling.
On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 03:51:29PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 09:43:16PM -0400, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:
> > + /*
> > + * If this sibling doesn't yet have a suitable task to
> > + * run; ask for the most elegible task, given the
> > + * highest priority task already selected for this
> > + * core.
> > + */
> > + p = pick_task(rq_i, class, max);
> > + if (!p) {
> > + /*
> > + * If there weren't no cookies; we don't need to
> > + * bother with the other siblings.
> > + * If the rest of the core is not running a tagged
> > + * task, i.e. need_sync == 0, and the current CPU
> > + * which called into the schedule() loop does not
> > + * have any tasks for this class, skip selecting for
> > + * other siblings since there's no point. We don't skip
> > + * for RT/DL because that could make CFS force-idle RT.
> > + */
> > + if (i == cpu && !need_sync && class == &fair_sched_class)
> > + goto next_class;
> > +
> > + continue;
> > + }
>
> I'm failing to understand the class == &fair_sched_class bit.
>
> IIRC the condition is such that the core doesn't have a cookie (we don't
> need to sync the threads) so we'll only do a pick for our local CPU.
>
> That should be invariant of class.
That is; it should be the exact counterpart of this bit:
> + /*
> + * Optimize the 'normal' case where there aren't any
> + * cookies and we don't need to sync up.
> + */
> + if (i == cpu && !need_sync && !p->core_cookie) {
> + next = p;
> + goto done;
> + }
If there is no task found in this class, try the next class, if there
is, we done.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists