linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] device property: Don't clear secondary pointer for shared primary firmware node

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <06eb930d-841f-29d9-e1e3-1f54d7bf10ca@gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 23 Oct 2020 16:16:35 +0200
From:   Ferry Toth <fntoth@...il.com>
To:     Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>,
        linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] device property: Don't clear secondary pointer for
 shared primary firmware node

Hi

Op 23-10-2020 om 14:35 schreef Heikki Krogerus:
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 09:41:00PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> It appears that firmware nodes can be shared between devices. In such 
>> case
>> when a (child) device is about to be deleted, its firmware node may 
>> be shared
>> and ACPI_COMPANION_SET(..., NULL) call for it breaks the secondary link
>> of the shared primary firmware node.
>>
>> In order to prevent that, check, if the device has a parent and parent's
>> firmware node is shared with its child, and avoid crashing the link.
>>
>> Fixes: c15e1bdda436 ("device property: Fix the secondary firmware 
>> node handling in set_primary_fwnode()")
>> Reported-by: Ferry Toth <fntoth@...il.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> FWIW:
>
> Reviewed-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>

Tested-by: Ferry Toth <fntoth@...il.com>

>> ---
>> drivers/base/core.c | 4 +++-
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/base/core.c b/drivers/base/core.c
>> index 41feab679fa1..78114ddac755 100644
>> --- a/drivers/base/core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/base/core.c
>> @@ -4264,6 +4264,7 @@ static inline bool fwnode_is_primary(struct 
>> fwnode_handle *fwnode)
>> */
>> void set_primary_fwnode(struct device *dev, struct fwnode_handle *fwnode)
>> {
>> + struct device *parent = dev->parent;
>> struct fwnode_handle *fn = dev->fwnode;
>> if (fwnode) {
>> @@ -4278,7 +4279,8 @@ void set_primary_fwnode(struct device *dev, 
>> struct fwnode_handle *fwnode)
>> } else {
>> if (fwnode_is_primary(fn)) {
>> dev->fwnode = fn->secondary;
>> - fn->secondary = ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
>> + if (!(parent && fn == parent->fwnode))
>> + fn->secondary = ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
>> } else {
>> dev->fwnode = NULL;
>> }
>> -- 2.28.0