lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201023165626.GK6756@twin.jikos.cz>
Date:   Fri, 23 Oct 2020 18:56:26 +0200
From:   David Sterba <dsterba@...e.cz>
To:     Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
Cc:     dsterba@...e.com, a.darwish@...utronix.de,
        linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: convert data_seqcount to seqcount_mutex_t

On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 01:17:24PM -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> By doing so we can associate the sequence counter to the chunk_mutex
> for lockdep purposes (compiled-out otherwise) and also avoid
> explicitly disabling preemption around the write region as it will now
> be done automatically by the seqcount machinery based on the lock type.

Thanks, the enhanced seqlock is new to me and makes sense regarding
lockdep. I've added a comment to mention the mutex association and added
it to misc-next.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ