[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c9512657-d7d0-bf04-0e40-b3463c9f5e1b@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2020 18:54:22 +0530
From: Aditya <yashsri421@...il.com>
To: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>
Cc: joe@...ches.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org,
dwaipayanray1@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] checkpatch: fix false positives in REPEATED_WORD
warning
On 24/10/20 12:36 am, Lukas Bulwahn wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 23 Oct 2020, Aditya Srivastava wrote:
>
>> Presence of hexadecimal address or symbol results in false warning
>> message by checkpatch.pl.
>>
>
> I think this strategy now makes sense and has the right complexity for a
> good heuristics in this case.
>
> Nice job, Aditya.
>
> Are you ready for a next challenge of this kind? Would you like to work on
> further rules that can be improved with your evaluation approach?
>
> Lukas
>
Yes, I would like work on further rules.
Thanks
Aditya
Powered by blists - more mailing lists