linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 12/20] perf arm-spe: Refactor counter packet handling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3a8f4d5c-b00a-d6b5-1bbf-c5c56254f9f2@arm.com>
Date:   Sat, 24 Oct 2020 01:31:58 +0100
From:   André Przywara <andre.przywara@....com>
To:     Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        Wei Li <liwei391@...wei.com>,
        James Clark <james.clark@....com>, Al Grant <Al.Grant@....com>,
        Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 12/20] perf arm-spe: Refactor counter packet handling

On 22/10/2020 15:58, Leo Yan wrote:

Hi,

> This patch defines macros for counter packet header, and uses macros to
> replace hard code values in functions arm_spe_get_counter() and
> arm_spe_pkt_desc().
> 
> In the function arm_spe_get_counter(), adds a new line for more
> readable.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
> ---
>  tools/perf/util/arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-pkt-decoder.c | 11 ++++++-----
>  tools/perf/util/arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-pkt-decoder.h |  8 ++++++++
>  2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-pkt-decoder.c b/tools/perf/util/arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-pkt-decoder.c
> index 023bcc9be3cc..6eebd30f3d78 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-pkt-decoder.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-pkt-decoder.c
> @@ -152,10 +152,11 @@ static int arm_spe_get_counter(const unsigned char *buf, size_t len,
>  			       const unsigned char ext_hdr, struct arm_spe_pkt *packet)
>  {
>  	packet->type = ARM_SPE_COUNTER;
> +
>  	if (ext_hdr)
> -		packet->index = ((buf[0] & 0x3) << 3) | (buf[1] & 0x7);
> +		packet->index = SPE_CNT_PKT_HDR_EXTENDED_INDEX(buf[0], buf[1]);
>  	else
> -		packet->index = buf[0] & 0x7;
> +		packet->index = SPE_CNT_PKT_HDR_SHORT_INDEX(buf[0]);
>  
>  	return arm_spe_get_payload(buf, len, ext_hdr, packet);
>  }
> @@ -307,17 +308,17 @@ static int arm_spe_pkt_desc_counter(const struct arm_spe_pkt *packet,
>  		return ret;
>  
>  	switch (packet->index) {
> -	case 0:
> +	case SPE_CNT_PKT_HDR_INDEX_TOTAL_LAT:
>  		ret = arm_spe_pkt_snprintf(&buf, &blen, "TOT");
>  		if (ret < 0)
>  			return ret;
>  		break;
> -	case 1:
> +	case SPE_CNT_PKT_HDR_INDEX_ISSUE_LAT:
>  		ret = arm_spe_pkt_snprintf(&buf, &blen, "ISSUE");
>  		if (ret < 0)
>  			return ret;
>  		break;
> -	case 2:
> +	case SPE_CNT_PKT_HDR_INDEX_TRANS_LAT:
>  		ret = arm_spe_pkt_snprintf(&buf, &blen, "XLAT");
>  		if (ret < 0)
>  			return ret;
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-pkt-decoder.h b/tools/perf/util/arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-pkt-decoder.h
> index 8808f2d0b6e4..8a291f451ef8 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-pkt-decoder.h
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-pkt-decoder.h
> @@ -84,6 +84,14 @@ struct arm_spe_pkt {
>  /* Context packet header */
>  #define SPE_CTX_PKT_HDR_INDEX(h)		((h) & GENMASK_ULL(1, 0))
>  
> +/* Counter packet header */
> +#define SPE_CNT_PKT_HDR_SHORT_INDEX(h)		((h) & GENMASK_ULL(2, 0))
> +#define SPE_CNT_PKT_HDR_EXTENDED_INDEX(h0, h1)	(((h0) & GENMASK_ULL(1, 0)) << 3 | \
> +						 SPE_ADDR_PKT_HDR_SHORT_INDEX(h1))

I would still like to see this merged with the SPE_ADDR_PKT_HDR_*_INDEX
definition in patch 10/20.

Otherwise this patch is fine.

Cheers,
Andre

> +#define SPE_CNT_PKT_HDR_INDEX_TOTAL_LAT		0x0
> +#define SPE_CNT_PKT_HDR_INDEX_ISSUE_LAT		0x1
> +#define SPE_CNT_PKT_HDR_INDEX_TRANS_LAT		0x2
> +
>  const char *arm_spe_pkt_name(enum arm_spe_pkt_type);
>  
>  int arm_spe_get_packet(const unsigned char *buf, size_t len,
>