linux-kernel - Re: [RFC 0/3] clk: imx: Implement blk-ctl driver for i.MX8MN

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201024202335.y3npwtgragpp5wcz@fsr-ub1664-175>
Date:   Sat, 24 Oct 2020 23:23:35 +0300
From:   Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@....com>
To:     Adam Ford <aford173@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, marex@...x.de,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
        Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
        Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
        NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/3] clk: imx: Implement blk-ctl driver for i.MX8MN

On 20-10-24 11:20:12, Adam Ford wrote:
> There are some less-documented registers which control clocks and 
> resets for the multimedia block which controls the LCDIF, ISI, MIPI 
> CSI, and MIPI DSI.
> 
> The i.Mx8M Nano appears to have a subset of the i.MX8MP registers with
> a couple shared registers with the i.MX8MM.  This series builds on the
> series that have been submitted for both of those other two platforms.
> 
> This is an RFC because when enabling the corresponding DTS node, the 
> system freezes on power on.  There are a couple of clocks that don't
> correspond to either the imx8mp nor the imx8mm, so I might have something
> wrong, and I was hoping for some constructive feedback in order to get
> the imx8m Nano to a similar point of the Mini and Plus.
> 

Thanks for the effort.

I'm assuming this relies on the following patchset, right ?
https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/10/24/139

> Adam Ford (3):
>   dt-bindings: clock: imx8mn: Add media blk_ctl clock IDs
>   dt-bindings: reset: imx8mn: Add media blk_ctl reset IDs
>   clk: imx: Add blk-ctl driver for i.MX8MN
> 
>  drivers/clk/imx/clk-blk-ctl-imx8mn.c     | 80 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/dt-bindings/clock/imx8mn-clock.h | 11 ++++
>  include/dt-bindings/reset/imx8mn-reset.h | 22 +++++++
>  3 files changed, 113 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/clk/imx/clk-blk-ctl-imx8mn.c
>  create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/reset/imx8mn-reset.h
> 
> -- 
> 2.25.1
>