[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201025171613.GT26280@localhost>
Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2020 18:16:13 +0100
From: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Ahmed S. Darwish" <a.darwish@...utronix.de>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Winischhofer <thomas@...ischhofer.net>,
Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...el.com>,
Valentina Manea <valentina.manea.m@...il.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>,
Duncan Sands <duncan.sands@...e.fr>
Subject: Re: [patch V2 04/13] USB: serial: digi_acceleport: Remove
in_interrupt() usage
On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 12:06:33PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> From: Ahmed S. Darwish <a.darwish@...utronix.de>
>
> The usage of in_interrupt() in drivers is phased out and Linus clearly
> requested that code which changes behaviour depending on context should
> either be separated or the context be conveyed in an argument passed by the
> caller, which usually knows the context.
>
> The debug printk() in digi_write() prints in_interrupt() as context
> information. TTY writes happen always in preemptible task context and
> console writes can happen from almost any context, so in_interrupt() is not
> really helpful.
The above statement is not correct, TTY writes can and do happen from
other contexts, including soft IRQ (e.g. PPP).
> Aside of that issuing a printk() from a console->write() callback is not a
> really brilliant idea for obvious reasons.
True, but we don't need to sprinkle conditionals for the benefit of
people trying to debug USB serial drivers using a USB serial console.
They get what they deserve. ;)
> Remove the in_interrupt() printout and make the printk() depend on tty.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ahmed S. Darwish <a.darwish@...utronix.de>
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Cc: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> Cc: linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
>
> ---
> drivers/usb/serial/digi_acceleport.c | 7 ++++---
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/drivers/usb/serial/digi_acceleport.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/serial/digi_acceleport.c
> @@ -911,9 +911,10 @@ static int digi_write(struct tty_struct
> unsigned char *data = port->write_urb->transfer_buffer;
> unsigned long flags = 0;
>
> - dev_dbg(&port->dev,
> - "digi_write: TOP: port=%d, count=%d, in_interrupt=%ld\n",
> - priv->dp_port_num, count, in_interrupt());
> + if (tty) {
> + dev_dbg(&port->dev, "digi_write: TOP: port=%d, count=%d\n",
> + priv->dp_port_num, count);
> + }
So just drop the in_interrupt() here.
Also note that we already have another unconditional dev_dbg() at the
end of this function.
>
> /* copy user data (which can sleep) before getting spin lock */
> count = min(count, port->bulk_out_size-2);
>
Johan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists