[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201025065957.5736elloorffcdif@skbuf>
Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2020 06:59:58 +0000
From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
To: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...dia.com>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org"
<bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...dia.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
"vivien.didelot@...il.com" <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
"jiri@...lanox.com" <jiri@...lanox.com>,
"idosch@...sch.org" <idosch@...sch.org>,
"f.fainelli@...il.com" <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
"andrew@...n.ch" <andrew@...n.ch>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] net: bridge: multicast: add support for L2 entries
On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 09:17:07AM +0000, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
> > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/if_bridge.h b/include/uapi/linux/if_bridge.h
> > index 4c687686aa8f..a25f6f9aa8c3 100644
> > --- a/include/uapi/linux/if_bridge.h
> > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/if_bridge.h
> > @@ -520,12 +520,14 @@ struct br_mdb_entry {
> > #define MDB_FLAGS_FAST_LEAVE (1 << 1)
> > #define MDB_FLAGS_STAR_EXCL (1 << 2)
> > #define MDB_FLAGS_BLOCKED (1 << 3)
> > +#define MDB_FLAGS_L2 (1 << 5)
>
> I think this should be 4.
>
Shouldn't this be in sync with MDB_PG_FLAGS_L2 though? We also have
MDB_PG_FLAGS_BLOCKED which is BIT(4).
Powered by blists - more mailing lists