[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAG3jFyvePZ8OZ+0_8pK7t=-UECd5q8tZ4a=c-dbMcNm6pgfnrQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2020 20:50:19 +0100
From: Robert Foss <robert.foss@...aro.org>
To: kholk11@...il.com
Cc: Todor Tomov <todor.too@...il.com>, Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, marijns95@...il.com,
konradybcio@...il.com, martin.botka1@...il.com,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-media <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] Add support for SDM630/660 Camera Subsystem
Hey Angelo,
I can't functionally test the code myself, but the series looks good to me now.
Reviewed-by: Robert Foss <robert.foss@...aro.org>
On Thu, 22 Oct 2020 at 19:47, <kholk11@...il.com> wrote:
>
> From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <kholk11@...il.com>
>
> This patch series implements support for the entire camera subsystem
> found in SDM630/636/660 and SDA variants, including CSIPHY 3-Phase,
> CSID v5.0, ISPIF 3.0 (though it didn't need any adaptation) and
> VFE 4.8.
>
> One small note about VFE4.8, even if I wrote it in the commit that
> adds support for it: I know, the VFE support here is split in
> multiple files having the name of the actual VFE version that it is
> targeting... but it didn't feel right to commonize the VFE 4.7 file
> and make another one only for VFE4.8, when it's just about something
> like 3 small differences.
> That VFE 4.8 seems to be just a minor revision of VFE 4.7.
>
> While at it, also fix a small issue when using two VFEs: only one
> of them was being resetted (always VFE0) so, after the first usage
> of VFE1, in case we leave it in a bad state, it would not properly
> start again. Now... it's fine :)))
>
> P.S.: SDM630/660's camss seems to be *very* similar to MSM8998, so
> likely 90% of this series should be reusable on that one, too!
>
> Tested on:
> - Sony Xperia XA2 (IMX300 on CSI0/PHY0/VFE0, IMX219 on CSI2,PHY2,VFE1)
> * VFE0/1 RDI only, as the VIDEO one does not work with SRGGB Bayer
> formats yet. As far as I can see, that color format hasn't been
> implemented yet in the video interface.
>
> Changes in v2:
> - Splitted out VFE 4.7 functions rename from the VFE 4.8 support commit
> - Moved a commit so that sequentially picking patches from this series
> still results in buildable code (heh, oops! sorry!)
> - Fixed ispif reset commit (moved the fix for itfrom the wrong commit
> to the right one: that was a "funny" overlook).
>
> AngeloGioacchino Del Regno (7):
> media: camss: ispif: Correctly reset based on the VFE ID
> media: camss: vfe-4-7: Rename get_ub_size, set_qos, set_ds, wm_enable
> media: camss: vfe: Add support for VFE 4.8
> media: camss: Add support for SDM630/636/660 camera subsystem
> media: camss: csiphy-3ph: Add support for SDM630/660
> media: dt-bindings: media: qcom,camss: Add bindings for SDM660 camss
> media: camss: csiphy: Set rate on csiX_phy clock on SDM630/660
>
> .../devicetree/bindings/media/qcom,camss.txt | 7 +
> .../media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-csid.c | 9 +-
> .../qcom/camss/camss-csiphy-3ph-1-0.c | 7 +-
> .../media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-csiphy.c | 25 ++-
> .../media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-csiphy.h | 1 +
> .../media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-ispif.c | 100 ++++++---
> .../media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-ispif.h | 2 +-
> .../media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-vfe-4-7.c | 131 ++++++++++-
> drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-vfe.c | 19 +-
> drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-vfe.h | 1 +
> .../media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-video.c | 3 +-
> drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss.c | 206 +++++++++++++++++-
> drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss.h | 1 +
> 13 files changed, 450 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.28.0
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists