[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ccec2428-0efe-101c-11be-28766738951d@nvidia.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2020 12:29:18 +0530
From: Vidya Sagar <vidyas@...dia.com>
To: Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>,
"gustavo.pimentel@...opsys.com" <gustavo.pimentel@...opsys.com>,
"lorenzo.pieralisi@....com" <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
"bhelgaas@...gle.com" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"amurray@...goodpenguin.co.uk" <amurray@...goodpenguin.co.uk>,
"robh@...nel.org" <robh@...nel.org>,
"treding@...dia.com" <treding@...dia.com>,
"jonathanh@...dia.com" <jonathanh@...dia.com>
CC: "linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"kthota@...dia.com" <kthota@...dia.com>,
"mmaddireddy@...dia.com" <mmaddireddy@...dia.com>,
"sagar.tv@...il.com" <sagar.tv@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] PCI: dwc: Add support to configure for ECRC
On 10/26/2020 2:19 AM, Jingoo Han wrote:
> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
>
>
> On 10/25/20, 3:31 AM, Vidya Sagar wrote:
>>
>> DesignWare core has a TLP digest (TD) override bit in one of the control
>> registers of ATU. This bit also needs to be programmed for proper ECRC
>> functionality. This is currently identified as an issue with DesignWare
>> IP version 4.90a. This patch does the required programming in ATU upon
>> querying the system policy for ECRC.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vidya Sagar <vidyas@...dia.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c | 8 ++++++--
>> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h | 2 ++
>> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c
>> index b5e438b70cd5..810dcbdbe869 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c
>> @@ -245,7 +245,7 @@ static void dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu_unroll(struct dw_pcie *pci, u8 func_no,
>> lower_32_bits(pci_addr));
>> dw_pcie_writel_ob_unroll(pci, index, PCIE_ATU_UNR_UPPER_TARGET,
>> upper_32_bits(pci_addr));
>> - val = type | PCIE_ATU_FUNC_NUM(func_no);
>> + val = type | PCIE_ATU_FUNC_NUM(func_no) | pci->td << PCIE_ATU_TD_SHIFT;
>> val = upper_32_bits(size - 1) ?
>> val | PCIE_ATU_INCREASE_REGION_SIZE : val;
>> dw_pcie_writel_ob_unroll(pci, index, PCIE_ATU_UNR_REGION_CTRL1, val);
>> @@ -295,7 +295,8 @@ static void __dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu(struct dw_pcie *pci, u8 func_no,
>> dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, PCIE_ATU_UPPER_TARGET,
>> upper_32_bits(pci_addr));
>> dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, PCIE_ATU_CR1, type |
>> - PCIE_ATU_FUNC_NUM(func_no));
>> + PCIE_ATU_FUNC_NUM(func_no) |
>> + pci->td << PCIE_ATU_TD_SHIFT);
>> dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, PCIE_ATU_CR2, PCIE_ATU_ENABLE);
>>
>> /*
>> @@ -565,6 +566,9 @@ void dw_pcie_setup(struct dw_pcie *pci)
>> dev_dbg(pci->dev, "iATU unroll: %s\n", pci->iatu_unroll_enabled ?
>> "enabled" : "disabled");
>>
>> + if (pci->version == 0x490A)
>> + pci->td = pcie_is_ecrc_enabled();
>> +
>> if (pci->link_gen > 0)
>> dw_pcie_link_set_max_speed(pci, pci->link_gen);
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h
>> index 21dd06831b50..d34723e42e79 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h
>> @@ -90,6 +90,7 @@
>> #define PCIE_ATU_TYPE_IO 0x2
>> #define PCIE_ATU_TYPE_CFG0 0x4
>> #define PCIE_ATU_TYPE_CFG1 0x5
>> +#define PCIE_ATU_TD_SHIFT 8
>> #define PCIE_ATU_FUNC_NUM(pf) ((pf) << 20)
>> #define PCIE_ATU_CR2 0x908
>> #define PCIE_ATU_ENABLE BIT(31)
>> @@ -276,6 +277,7 @@ struct dw_pcie {
>> int num_lanes;
>> int link_gen;
>> u8 n_fts[2];
>> + bool td; /* TLP Digest (for ECRC purpose) */
>
> If possible, don't add a new variable to 'dw_pcie' structure.
> Please find a way to set TD bit without adding a new variable to 'dw_pcie' structure'.
I can use pcie_is_ecrc_enabled() directly in place of pci->td. That
should be fine right? BTW, curious to know if there is any specific
reason behind asking not to add any new variables to 'dw_pcie' structure?
>
> Best regards,
> Jingoo Han
>
>> };
>>
>> #define to_dw_pcie_from_pp(port) container_of((port), struct dw_pcie, pp)
>> --
>> 2.17.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists