| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2020 08:58:27 +0100
From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
To: Arvind Sankar <nivedita@...m.mit.edu>
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org" <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>,
David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/6] crypto: Use memzero_explicit() for clearing state
On Sun, 25 Oct 2020 at 15:31, Arvind Sankar <nivedita@...m.mit.edu> wrote:
>
> Without the barrier_data() inside memzero_explicit(), the compiler may
> optimize away the state-clearing if it can tell that the state is not
> used afterwards.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arvind Sankar <nivedita@...m.mit.edu>
Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
I agree with Eric that, even though there are cases where it is
unlikely that the compiler could elide an ordinary memset() or struct
assignment (even under LTO), using memzero_explicit() is better in
these cases, as it also clarifies the intent of the operation, and
doesn't result in worse code now that memzero_explicit() is a static
inline around memset() and a barrier.
> ---
> arch/arm64/crypto/ghash-ce-glue.c | 2 +-
> arch/arm64/crypto/poly1305-glue.c | 2 +-
> arch/arm64/crypto/sha3-ce-glue.c | 2 +-
> arch/x86/crypto/poly1305_glue.c | 2 +-
> include/crypto/sha1_base.h | 3 ++-
> include/crypto/sha256_base.h | 3 ++-
> include/crypto/sha512_base.h | 3 ++-
> include/crypto/sm3_base.h | 3 ++-
> 8 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/crypto/ghash-ce-glue.c b/arch/arm64/crypto/ghash-ce-glue.c
> index 8536008e3e35..2427e2f3a9a1 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/crypto/ghash-ce-glue.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/crypto/ghash-ce-glue.c
> @@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ static int ghash_final(struct shash_desc *desc, u8 *dst)
> put_unaligned_be64(ctx->digest[1], dst);
> put_unaligned_be64(ctx->digest[0], dst + 8);
>
> - *ctx = (struct ghash_desc_ctx){};
> + memzero_explicit(ctx, sizeof(*ctx));
> return 0;
> }
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/crypto/poly1305-glue.c b/arch/arm64/crypto/poly1305-glue.c
> index f33ada70c4ed..683de671741a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/crypto/poly1305-glue.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/crypto/poly1305-glue.c
> @@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ void poly1305_final_arch(struct poly1305_desc_ctx *dctx, u8 *dst)
> }
>
> poly1305_emit(&dctx->h, dst, dctx->s);
> - *dctx = (struct poly1305_desc_ctx){};
> + memzero_explicit(dctx, sizeof(*dctx));
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(poly1305_final_arch);
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/crypto/sha3-ce-glue.c b/arch/arm64/crypto/sha3-ce-glue.c
> index 9a4bbfc45f40..e5a2936f0886 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/crypto/sha3-ce-glue.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/crypto/sha3-ce-glue.c
> @@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ static int sha3_final(struct shash_desc *desc, u8 *out)
> if (digest_size & 4)
> put_unaligned_le32(sctx->st[i], (__le32 *)digest);
>
> - *sctx = (struct sha3_state){};
> + memzero_explicit(sctx, sizeof(*sctx));
> return 0;
> }
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/crypto/poly1305_glue.c b/arch/x86/crypto/poly1305_glue.c
> index e508dbd91813..64d09520d279 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/crypto/poly1305_glue.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/crypto/poly1305_glue.c
> @@ -209,7 +209,7 @@ void poly1305_final_arch(struct poly1305_desc_ctx *dctx, u8 *dst)
> }
>
> poly1305_simd_emit(&dctx->h, dst, dctx->s);
> - *dctx = (struct poly1305_desc_ctx){};
> + memzero_explicit(dctx, sizeof(*dctx));
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(poly1305_final_arch);
>
> diff --git a/include/crypto/sha1_base.h b/include/crypto/sha1_base.h
> index 20fd1f7468af..a5d6033efef7 100644
> --- a/include/crypto/sha1_base.h
> +++ b/include/crypto/sha1_base.h
> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
> #include <crypto/sha.h>
> #include <linux/crypto.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/string.h>
>
> #include <asm/unaligned.h>
>
> @@ -101,7 +102,7 @@ static inline int sha1_base_finish(struct shash_desc *desc, u8 *out)
> for (i = 0; i < SHA1_DIGEST_SIZE / sizeof(__be32); i++)
> put_unaligned_be32(sctx->state[i], digest++);
>
> - *sctx = (struct sha1_state){};
> + memzero_explicit(sctx, sizeof(*sctx));
> return 0;
> }
>
> diff --git a/include/crypto/sha256_base.h b/include/crypto/sha256_base.h
> index 6ded110783ae..93f9fd21cc06 100644
> --- a/include/crypto/sha256_base.h
> +++ b/include/crypto/sha256_base.h
> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
> #include <crypto/sha.h>
> #include <linux/crypto.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/string.h>
>
> #include <asm/unaligned.h>
>
> @@ -105,7 +106,7 @@ static inline int sha256_base_finish(struct shash_desc *desc, u8 *out)
> for (i = 0; digest_size > 0; i++, digest_size -= sizeof(__be32))
> put_unaligned_be32(sctx->state[i], digest++);
>
> - *sctx = (struct sha256_state){};
> + memzero_explicit(sctx, sizeof(*sctx));
> return 0;
> }
>
> diff --git a/include/crypto/sha512_base.h b/include/crypto/sha512_base.h
> index fb19c77494dc..93ab73baa38e 100644
> --- a/include/crypto/sha512_base.h
> +++ b/include/crypto/sha512_base.h
> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
> #include <crypto/sha.h>
> #include <linux/crypto.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/string.h>
>
> #include <asm/unaligned.h>
>
> @@ -126,7 +127,7 @@ static inline int sha512_base_finish(struct shash_desc *desc, u8 *out)
> for (i = 0; digest_size > 0; i++, digest_size -= sizeof(__be64))
> put_unaligned_be64(sctx->state[i], digest++);
>
> - *sctx = (struct sha512_state){};
> + memzero_explicit(sctx, sizeof(*sctx));
> return 0;
> }
>
> diff --git a/include/crypto/sm3_base.h b/include/crypto/sm3_base.h
> index 1cbf9aa1fe52..2f3a32ab97bb 100644
> --- a/include/crypto/sm3_base.h
> +++ b/include/crypto/sm3_base.h
> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
> #include <crypto/sm3.h>
> #include <linux/crypto.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/string.h>
> #include <asm/unaligned.h>
>
> typedef void (sm3_block_fn)(struct sm3_state *sst, u8 const *src, int blocks);
> @@ -104,7 +105,7 @@ static inline int sm3_base_finish(struct shash_desc *desc, u8 *out)
> for (i = 0; i < SM3_DIGEST_SIZE / sizeof(__be32); i++)
> put_unaligned_be32(sctx->state[i], digest++);
>
> - *sctx = (struct sm3_state){};
> + memzero_explicit(sctx, sizeof(*sctx));
> return 0;
> }
>
> --
> 2.26.2
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists