[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201026090526.GA1154158@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2020 11:05:26 +0200
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>
To: "Edgecombe, Rick P" <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>
Cc: "akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"david@...hat.com" <david@...hat.com>,
"cl@...ux.com" <cl@...ux.com>,
"gor@...ux.ibm.com" <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"catalin.marinas@....com" <catalin.marinas@....com>,
"dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"borntraeger@...ibm.com" <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
"will@...nel.org" <will@...nel.org>,
"penberg@...nel.org" <penberg@...nel.org>,
"iamjoonsoo.kim@....com" <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
"aou@...s.berkeley.edu" <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
"kirill@...temov.name" <kirill@...temov.name>,
"rientjes@...gle.com" <rientjes@...gle.com>,
"rppt@...ux.ibm.com" <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>,
"paulus@...ba.org" <paulus@...ba.org>,
"hca@...ux.ibm.com" <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
"pavel@....cz" <pavel@....cz>, "bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>,
"sparclinux@...r.kernel.org" <sparclinux@...r.kernel.org>,
"mpe@...erman.id.au" <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
"luto@...nel.org" <luto@...nel.org>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"rjw@...ysocki.net" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
"linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
"benh@...nel.crashing.org" <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
"linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"palmer@...belt.com" <palmer@...belt.com>,
"Brown, Len" <len.brown@...el.com>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"linux-s390@...r.kernel.org" <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"paul.walmsley@...ive.com" <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] arch, mm: improve robustness of direct map
manipulation
On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 01:13:52AM +0000, Edgecombe, Rick P wrote:
> On Sun, 2020-10-25 at 12:15 +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > Indeed, for architectures that define CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_SET_DIRECT_MAP
> > it is
> > possible that __kernel_map_pages() would fail, but since this
> > function is
> > void, the failure will go unnoticed.
>
> Could you elaborate on how this could happen? Do you mean during
> runtime today or if something new was introduced?
A failure in__kernel_map_pages() may happen today. For instance, on x86
if the kernel is built with DEBUG_PAGEALLOC.
__kernel_map_pages(page, 1, 0);
will need to split, say, 2M page and during the split an allocation of
page table could fail.
Currently, the only user of __kernel_map_pages() outside DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
is hibernation, but I think it would be safer to entirely prevent usage
of __kernel_map_pages() when DEBUG_PAGEALLOC=n.
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists