[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87eell46y2.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2020 11:28:37 +0100
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Michael Weiß <michael.weiss@...ec.fraunhofer.de>,
Andrei Vagin <avagin@...il.com>,
Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>
Cc: Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"J . Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...merspace.com>,
Anna Schumaker <anna.schumaker@...app.com>,
Michael Weiß <michael.weiss@...ec.fraunhofer.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] fs/proc: apply the time namespace offset to /proc/stat btime
On Mon, Oct 19 2020 at 21:52, Michael Weiß wrote:
> '/proc/stat' provides the field 'btime' which states the time stamp of
> system boot in seconds. In case of time namespaces, the offset to the
> boot time stamp was not applied earlier. However, in container
> runtimes which utilize time namespaces to virtualize boottime of a
> container, this leaks information about the host system boot time.
Not sure if that qualifies as a leak. The point is that it confuses the
tasks which are in a different time universe.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists